Business
Jobs
  • About Us
  • Solutions
    • Job Postings
      Post your job and receive qualified candidates in 48h.
    • Candidate Assessments
      500+ technical and psychological tests, plus anti-fraud.
    • Headhunting
      Tailor-made executive search from start to finish.
    • Payroll + EOR
      Payroll dispersal and EOR across 15+ LATAM countries.
  • Pricing
  • Jobs

0

392
Views
Celery: When should you choose Redis as a message broker over RabbitMQ?

My rough understanding is that Redis is better if you need the in-memory key-value store feature, however I am not sure how that has anything to do with distributing tasks?

Does that mean we should use Redis as a message broker IF we are already using it for something else?

over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo
1 answers
Answer question

0

I've used both recently (2017-2018), and they are both super stable with Celery 4. So your choice can be based on the details of your hosting setup.

  • If you must use Celery version 2 or version 3, go with RabbitMQ. Otherwise...
  • If you are using Redis for any other reason, go with Redis
  • If you are hosting at AWS, go with Redis so that you can use a managed Redis as service
  • If you hate complicated installs, go with Redis
  • If you already have RabbitMQ installed, stay with RabbitMQ

In the past, I would have recommended RabbitMQ because it was more stable and easier to setup with Celery than Redis, but I don't believe that's true any more.


Update 2019

AWS now has a managed service that is equivalent to RabbitMQ called Amazon MQ, which could reduce the headache of running this as a service in production. Please comment below if you have any experience with this and celery.

over 4 years ago · Santiago Trujillo Report
Answer question
Find remote jobs

Discover the new way to find a job!

Top jobs
Top job categories
Business
Post vacancy Pricing Sales
Legal
Terms and conditions Privacy policy
© 2026 PeakU Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Andres GPT
Show me some job opportunities
There's an error!